Investigates: Deep dives into public spending, contracts, and accountability

Written By
Michelle Tapinski
Updated
November 19, 2025
forensic accounting

Why Public Spending Scrutiny Matters

Tax dollars flow through budgets, grants, and contracts. Tracking those flows tests whether programs work, vendors deliver, and communities benefit. With today’s data, anyone can follow funds from appropriation to invoice.

How the Money Moves

  • Appropriations, obligations, outlays: approval, commitment, payment.
  • Contracts buy goods and services; grants and cooperative agreements fund public purposes.
  • Prime awards go to main recipients; subawards flow to partners and subcontractors.
  • Key risk points: limited competition, change orders, performance and closeout.

Where the Records Live

  • USAspending.gov: federal award and subaward data with filters and downloads.
  • SAM.gov: contract opportunities, award notices, entities, justifications.
  • Assistance Listings at SAM.gov: program rules and CFDA links to awards.
  • Inspectors General and GAO: audits, investigations, work plans.
  • State and local transparency portals: checkbook data, contracts, payroll.
  • Third-party tools: watchdog databases that aggregate and visualize spend.

Step-by-Step to Follow the Money

  1. Define the question, scope, time, and place.
  2. Query USAspending by agency, recipient, NAICS, keywords. Export awards and transactions.
  3. Review subawards for who actually performs the work.
  4. Use SAM.gov to pull solicitations, awards, and competition justifications.
  5. Build a timeline of posting, award, performance, and modifications.
  6. Compare deliverables to invoices and modification notes.
  7. Benchmark vendors for concentration, past performance, and related entities.

Red Flags

  • No-bid or limited competition without strong justification.
  • Repeated modifications that inflate cost or extend scope.
  • One vendor dominating a program or office.
  • Related entities sharing owners or addresses.
  • Terminations, cure notices, or poor performance histories.

Accountability Tools

  • Inspectors General hotlines and reports.
  • GAO evaluations and high-risk lists.
  • Suspension and debarment actions.
  • Bid protests and contract appeals.
  • State auditors and comptrollers.

FOIA and Public Records Tips

  • Ask for solicitations, statements of work, proposals, source selection records, contracts, modifications, invoices, performance reviews, and monitoring reports.
  • Be precise with award IDs, dates, custodians, and scope.
  • Use appeals and OGIS mediation when needed.
  • Track deadlines and request rolling releases.

A Quick Example

An $8 million emergency IT award climbs to $25 million through four modifications. The award was not posted for competition, subawards route most work to a connected firm, and invoices mirror preventable scope changes. This pattern points to competition and management risks.

State and Local Angle

City, county, and school contracts can be reviewed through agendas, minutes, and transparency portals. State records laws often move faster than federal FOIA.

Data Use and Ethics

Validate downloads against source documents. Protect sensitive personal data and sources. Document methods and limits.

Toolkit

  • Core sites: USAspending.gov, SAM.gov, OIGs, GAO, state portals.
  • Identifiers: PIID, Assistance Listing, NAICS, UEI, solicitation number.
  • Workflow: search, export, reconcile IDs, build timelines, request records, publish with clear visuals.

Bottom Line

Start with a focused question, trace awards and changes, obtain the records behind the numbers, and present findings that connect spending to outcomes and accountability.